Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Wealth Axis Pro
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-16 23:46:31
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (376)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Man led Las Vegas police on chase as he carjacked bystanders, killed father of 7
- Perspective: Children born poor have little margin for mistakes or bad decisions, regardless of race
- San Antonio police release video of persons of interest in killing of pregnant Texas teen Savanah Soto and boyfriend Matthew Guerra
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Ariana Grande Addresses Assumptions About Her Life After Challenging Year
- Lulus’ End of the Year Sale Shines with $17 Dresses, $15 Bodysuits, $11 Tops & More
- Wawa moving into Georgia as convenience store chains expands: See the locations
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- University of Wisconsin-La Crosse chancellor fired for appearing in porn videos
Ranking
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Are bowl games really worth the hassle anymore, especially as Playoff expansion looms?
- These Coach Bags Are Up To $300 Off & Totally Worth Spending Your Gift Card On
- Recall of nearly 5 million portable blenders under way for unsafe blades and dozens of burn injuries
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Bobby Rivers, actor, TV critic and host on VH1 and Food Network, dead at 70
- Founder of the American Family Association dies in Mississippi
- New Year's Eve partiers paying up to $12,500 to ring in 2024 at Times Square locations of chain restaurants
Recommendation
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Iran holds funeral for a general who was killed by an alleged Israeli airstrike in Syria
'Let's Get It On' ... in court (Update)
Skull found in 1986 identified as missing casino nurse, authorities say
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Navalny confirms he's in Arctic penal colony and says he's fine
The New York Times is suing OpenAI over copyright breaches, here's what you need to know
What are the Dry January rules? What to know if you're swearing off alcohol in 2024.